This link is to a client alert written by Ann Sobolewski and Jo-Ann Marzullo on a recent Massachusetts Superior Court decision (Cummings Properties, LLC v. Massachusetts General Physicians Organization) and its implications for users of properties subject to Activity and Use Limitations (“AULs”)
Court clarifies how to apply the standard for summary judgment to claims alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The end of the year and the accompanying holidays often bring requests by employees for time off for the religious observances and requests to display religious symbols at work.
This edition gives a status report on the Department of Homeland Security’s rule, announced in August 2007, addressing what employers should do upon receipt of a “no-match” letter from the Social Security Administration. Implementation of the rule was recently enjoined by a federal judge, and DHS is working on a revised rule. The article goes on to provide pointers on what employers can do in response to no-match letters pending publication of the revised rule.
We thought it would be helpful to draw the attention of potential occupiers and investors of commercial property to the Code for Leasing Business Premises in England and Wales…………………..
This is Part 2 of a recently published article jointly written by Alison Green, Head of Family Law in the London Office of Mackrell Turner Garrett, and Mark Parker & Rachell Pavone of Lander & Rogers, Sydney Australia.